zkSync and Starknet DeFi Bots: The Zero-Knowledge L2 Opportunity
zkSync Era and Starknet offer Ethereum-level security with L2 fees. Learn how to build trading bots on zero-knowledge rollups and why they're the future of DeFi automation.
Builder of AI agents, crypto trading bots, and open-source automation tools. Sharing practical guides on how to build, deploy, and profit from AI and DeFi technology.
Why ZK Rollups Matter for Trading Bots
Ethereum rollups come in two flavors: Optimistic (Arbitrum, Optimism, Base) and ZK (zkSync, Starknet, Polygon zkEVM). For trading bots, the key differences:
| Feature | Optimistic Rollups | ZK Rollups | |---------|-------------------|-----------| | Withdrawal to L1 | 7 days (fraud proof window) | Minutes (validity proof) | | Security model | Assume valid, challenge if wrong | Cryptographically proven valid | | EVM compatibility | Near-perfect | Varies by implementation | | Fees | $0.05-0.50 | $0.01-0.20 | | Finality | ~1 hour | Near-instant |
For bots that need to move capital quickly between L1 and L2, ZK rollups win decisively โ no 7-day withdrawal wait.
zkSync Era: The EVM-Compatible ZK Rollup
zkSync Era is the most EVM-compatible ZK rollup. Your Solidity contracts and ethers.js/viem code works with minimal changes.
import { Provider, Wallet, Contract } from 'zksync-ethers'
import { ethers } from 'ethers'
const ZKSYNC_MAINNET_RPC = 'https://mainnet.era.zksync.io'
const provider = new Provider(ZKSYNC_MAINNET_RPC)
const wallet = new Wallet(process.env.PRIVATE_KEY!, provider)
console.log(`Connected to zkSync Era. Wallet: ${wallet.address}`)
// Check ETH balance
const balance = await wallet.getBalance()
console.log(`ETH balance: ${ethers.formatEther(balance)} ETH`)
// Check USDC balance
const USDC_ZKSYNC = '0x3355df6D4c9C3035724Fd0e3914dE96A5a83aaf4'
const usdc = new Contract(USDC_ZKSYNC, ERC20_ABI, wallet)
const usdcBalance = await usdc.balanceOf(wallet.address)
console.log(`USDC balance: ${ethers.formatUnits(usdcBalance, 6)} USDC`)
Trading on SyncSwap (zkSync's Main DEX)
const SYNCSWAP_ROUTER = '0x2da10A1e27bF85cEdD8FFb1AbBe97e53391C0295'
const SYNCSWAP_ROUTER_ABI = [
'function swap(tuple(address pool, bytes data, address callback, bytes callbackData)[] paths, uint amountIn, uint amountOutMin, uint deadline) payable returns (uint amountOut)',
]
async function swapOnSyncSwap(
tokenIn: string,
tokenOut: string,
amountIn: bigint
): Promise<string> {
const router = new Contract(SYNCSWAP_ROUTER, SYNCSWAP_ROUTER_ABI, wallet)
// Find pool for token pair
const poolAddress = await getPoolAddress(tokenIn, tokenOut)
// Encode swap data (SyncSwap specific format)
const swapData = ethers.AbiCoder.defaultAbiCoder().encode(
['address', 'address', 'uint8'],
[tokenIn, wallet.address, 1] // 1 = withdraw to address
)
const paths = [{
pool: poolAddress,
data: swapData,
callback: ethers.ZeroAddress,
callbackData: '0x',
}]
const deadline = BigInt(Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000) + 300)
const amountOutMin = amountIn * 995n / 1000n // 0.5% slippage
const tx = await router.swap(paths, amountIn, amountOutMin, deadline)
const receipt = await tx.wait()
console.log(`โ
Swap on SyncSwap: ${receipt.hash}`)
return receipt.hash
}
Starknet: Cairo-Based ZK Powerhouse
Starknet uses Cairo (not Solidity) โ a custom language designed for ZK proofs. The learning curve is steeper but performance is exceptional.
# Python SDK for Starknet
from starknet_py.net.full_node_client import FullNodeClient
from starknet_py.net.account.account import Account
from starknet_py.net.models.chains import StarknetChainId
from starknet_py.net.signer.stark_curve_signer import KeyPair
STARKNET_RPC = "https://starknet-mainnet.public.blastapi.io/rpc/v0_7"
client = FullNodeClient(node_url=STARKNET_RPC)
key_pair = KeyPair.from_private_key(int(STARKNET_PRIVATE_KEY, 16))
account = Account(
client=client,
address=STARKNET_ADDRESS,
key_pair=key_pair,
chain=StarknetChainId.MAINNET,
)
# Get ETH balance on Starknet
ETH_CONTRACT = 0x049d36570d4e46f48e99674bd3fcc84644ddd6b96f7c741b1562b82f9e004dc7
balance_response = await client.call_contract(
call=Call(
to_addr=ETH_CONTRACT,
selector=get_selector_from_name("balanceOf"),
calldata=[account.address]
),
block_number="latest"
)
eth_balance = balance_response[0] / 1e18
print(f"ETH balance on Starknet: {eth_balance:.4f} ETH")
Trading on JediSwap (Starknet's Uniswap V2)
from starknet_py.contract import Contract
JEDISWAP_ROUTER = 0x041fd22b238fa21cfcf5dd45a8548974d8263b3a531a60388411c5e230f97023
async def swap_on_jediswap(
token_in: int,
token_out: int,
amount_in: int
) -> dict:
"""Swap tokens on JediSwap"""
router = await Contract.from_address(
address=JEDISWAP_ROUTER,
provider=account,
)
# Get expected output
amounts = await router.functions["get_amounts_out"].call(
amount_in,
[token_in, token_out]
)
amount_out_min = int(amounts.amounts[1] * 0.99) # 1% slippage
deadline = int(time.time()) + 300
invocation = await router.functions["swap_exact_tokens_for_tokens"].invoke(
amount_in=amount_in,
amount_out_min=amount_out_min,
path=[token_in, token_out],
to=account.address,
deadline=deadline,
auto_estimate=True
)
await invocation.wait_for_acceptance()
print(f"โ
JediSwap swap complete: {invocation.hash}")
return {'hash': invocation.hash, 'amount_out': amounts.amounts[1]}
ZK Bridge Bots: Arbitrage the Bridging Premium
One unique opportunity on ZK chains: assets bridged from Ethereum sometimes trade at a premium/discount vs their L1 price due to bridging delays. A bot monitoring both prices can capture this spread.
async function checkBridgingArb(asset: string): Promise<void> {
const l1Price = await getEthereumPrice(asset)
const l2Price = await getZkSyncPrice(asset)
const spread = (l2Price - l1Price) / l1Price
if (spread > 0.005) {
console.log(`๐ Bridge arb: ${asset} is ${(spread*100).toFixed(2)}% more expensive on zkSync`)
console.log(` Buy on L1, bridge to zkSync, sell`)
// Note: ZK bridge is fast (minutes) but still has tx costs
} else if (spread < -0.005) {
console.log(`๐ Bridge arb: ${asset} is ${(Math.abs(spread)*100).toFixed(2)}% cheaper on zkSync`)
console.log(` Buy on zkSync, bridge to L1, sell`)
}
}
Should You Build on ZK Chains?
For bots that need fast L1 access: ZK chains win โ no 7-day delay.
For maximum DeFi liquidity: Arbitrum and Base currently have deeper liquidity pools.
For long-term builders: ZK is the future. Starknet and zkSync are actively gaining TVL and the technology is becoming more accessible.
The ZK rollup ecosystem is 2-3 years behind Optimistic in liquidity but 5-10 years ahead in technology. Early builders who master these chains will have significant advantages as liquidity migrates.
Related Articles
Arbitrum vs Optimism vs Base: Which L2 Is Best for Trading Bots?
5 min read
DeFiUniswap V4 Hooks: The New DeFi Bot Primitive Every Developer Must Know
5 min read
DeFiEthereum Layer 2 Trading Bot Comparison: Arbitrum vs Base vs Optimism
5 min read
DeFiSolana vs Ethereum for DeFi Bots: Which Blockchain Wins in 2026?
4 min read